Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Volume 9 – Issue 04 – August 2015
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=DMP&tab=currentissue
.
Systematic Review
Core Competencies in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance: A Systematic Review
Alba Ripoll Gallardoa1 c1, Ahmadreza Djalalia1, Marco Folettia1, Luca Ragazzonia1, Francesco Della Cortea1, Olivera Lupescua2, Chris Arculeoa3, Gotz von Arnima4, Tom Friedla4, Michael Ashkenazia5, Philipp Fishera5, Boris Hreckovskia6, Amir Khorram-Manesha7, Radko Komadinaa8, Konstanze Lechnera9, Marc Stala10, Cristina Patrua11, Frederick M. Burklea12 and Pier Luigi Ingrassiaa1
a1 CRIMEDIM, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
a2 URGENTA, Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
a3 Hanover Associates, Teddington, London, UK
a4 NHCS, National Health Career School of Management, Hennigsdorf/Berlin,Germany
a5 Bonn International Center for Conversion, Bonn, University Clinic Bonn Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Bonn, Germany
a6 CROUMSA, Croatian Urgent Medicine and Surgery Association, Slav. Brod, Croatia
a7 Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
a8 SBC, General & Teaching Hospital Celje, Medical Faculty Ljubljana, Slovenia
a9 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
a10 Global Risk Forum GRF Davos, Davos, Switzerland
a11 Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
a12 Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Abstract
Disaster response demands a large workforce covering diverse professional sectors. Throughout this article, we illustrate the results of a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies to identify existing competency sets for disaster management and humanitarian assistance that would serve as guidance for the development of a common disaster curriculum. A systematic review of English-language articles was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ERIC, and Cochrane Library. Studies were included if reporting competency domains, abilities, knowledge, skills, or attitudes for professionals involved disaster relief or humanitarian assistance. Exclusion criteria included abstracts, citations, case studies, and studies not dealing with disasters or humanitarian assistance. Thirty-eight papers were analyzed. Target audience was defined in all articles. Five references (13%) reported cross-sectorial competencies. Most of the articles (81.6%) were specific to health care. Eighteen (47%) papers included competencies for at least 2 different disciplines and 18 (47%) for different professional groups. Nursing was the most widely represented cadre. Eighteen papers (47%) defined competency domains and 36 (94%) reported list of competencies. Nineteen articles (50%) adopted consensus-building to define competencies, and 12 (31%) included competencies adapted to different professional responsibility levels. This systematic review revealed that the largest number of papers were mainly focused on the health care sector and presented a lack of agreement on the terminology used for competency-based definition. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:430–439)
.
Original Research
The Public Sphere in Emerging Infectious Disease Communication: Recipient or Active and Vocal Partner?
Anat Gesser-Edelsburga1 c1, Yaffa Shir-Raza2, Nathan Waltera2, Emilio Mordinia3, Dimitris Dimitrioua4, James J. Jamesa5 and Manfred S. Greena1
a1 School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
a2 Department of Communication, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
a3 Responsible Technology SAS, Paris, France
a4 Zadig Communication, Information and Education in Science, Rome, Italy
a5 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Rockville, MD
ABSTRACT
Objective
Recent years have seen advances in theories and models of risk and crisis communication, with a focus on emerging epidemic infection. Nevertheless, information flow remains unilateral in many countries and does not take into account the public’s polyvocality and the fact that its opinions and knowledge often “compete” with those of health authorities. This article addresses the challenges organizations face in communicating with the public sphere.
Methods
Our theoretical approach is conceptualized through a framework that focuses on the public sphere and that builds upon existing guidelines and studies in the context of health and pandemics. We examine how health organizations cope with the public’s transformation from recipients to an active and vocal entity, ie, how and to what extent health organizations address the public’s anxiety and concerns arising in the social media during outbreaks.
Results Although international organizations have aspired to relate to the public as a partner, this article identifies notable gaps.
Conclusions
Organizations must involve the public throughout the crisis and conduct dialogues free of prejudices, paternalism, and preconceptions. Thereby, they can impart precise and updated information reflecting uncertainty and considering cultural differences to build trust and facilitate cooperation with the public sphere. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:447–458)