From Google Scholar+ [to 7 June 2014]
Selected content from beyond the journals and sources covered above, aggregated from a range of Google Scholar monitoring algorithms and other monitoring strategies.
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
http://link.springer.com/journal/11414/41/2/page/1
The Resilience Activation Framework: a Conceptual Model of How Access to Social Resources Promotes Adaptation and Rapid Recovery in Post-disaster Settings
David M. Abramson PhD MPH, Lynn M. Grattan PhD, Brian Mayer PhD, Craig E. Colten PhD, Farah A. Arosemena MPH, Ariane Bedimo-Rung PhD MPH, Maureen Lichtveld MD
Abstract
A number of governmental agencies have called for enhancing citizens’ resilience as a means of preparing populations in advance of disasters, and as a counterbalance to social and individual vulnerabilities. This increasing scholarly, policy, and programmatic interest in promoting individual and communal resilience presents a challenge to the research and practice communities: to develop a translational framework that can accommodate multidisciplinary scientific perspectives into a single, applied model. The Resilience Activation Framework provides a basis for testing how access to social resources, such as formal and informal social support and help, promotes positive adaptation or reduced psychopathology among individuals and communities exposed to the acute collective stressors associated with disasters, whether human-made, natural, or technological in origin. Articulating the mechanisms by which access to social resources activate and sustain resilience capacities for optimal mental health outcomes post-disaster can lead to the development of effective preventive and early intervention programs.
BMC Medical Ethics
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedethics/content
Debate
Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries
Elise Smith, Matthew Hunt and Zubin Master
BMC Medical Ethics 2014, 15:42 doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-42
Published: 28 May 2014
Abstract (provisional)
Background
Over the past two decades, the promotion of collaborative partnerships involving researchers from low and middle income countries with those from high income countries has been a major development in global health research. Ideally, these partnerships would lead to more equitable collaboration including the sharing of research responsibilities and rewards. While collaborative partnership initiatives have shown promise and attracted growing interest, there has been little scholarly debate regarding the fair distribution of authorship credit within these partnerships.
Discussion
In this paper, we identify four key authorship issues relevant to global health research and discuss their ethical and practical implications. First, we argue that authorship guidance may not adequately apply to global health research because it requires authors to write or substantially revise the manuscript. Since most journals of international reputation in global health are written in English, this would systematically and unjustly exclude non-English speaking researchers even if they have substantially contributed to the research project. Second, current guidance on authorship order does not address or mitigate unfair practices which can occur in global health research due to power differences between researchers from high and low-middle income countries. It also provides insufficient recognition of “technical tasks” such as local participant recruitment. Third, we consider the potential for real or perceived editorial bias in medical science journals in favour of prominent western researchers, and the risk of promoting misplaced credit and/or prestige authorship. Finally, we explore how diverse cultural practices and expectations regarding authorship may create conflict between researchers from low-middle and high income countries and contribute to unethical authorship practices. To effectively deal with these issues, we suggest: 1) the need for further empirical and conceptual research regarding authorship in global health research; 2) raising awareness on authorship issues in global health research; and 3) developing specific standards of practice that reflect relevant considerations of authorship in global health research.
Summary
Through review of the bioethics and global health literatures, and examination of guidance documents on ethical authorship, we identified a set of issues regarding authorship in collaborative partnerships between researchers from low-middle income countries and high income countries. We propose several recommendations to address these concerns.
Journal of International Development
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.v26.4/issuetoc
REVERSING THE TELESCOPE: EVALUATING NGO PEER REGULATION INITIATIVES
Angela M. Crack*
Article first published online: 1 JUN 2014
DOI: 10.1002/jid.3010
Abstract
This article investigates perceptions of the extent to which non-governmental organization (NGO) peer regulation initiatives have been effective in enhancing accountability in the humanitarian sector. It is based upon semi-structured interviews with individuals with responsibility for accountability policy from leading NGOs and focuses on two of the best-known initiatives: Humanitarian Accountability Partnership and Sphere. It finds that the initiatives have prompted positive changes in practice, but there are significant concerns about their deleterious impacts. Participants describe a host of challenges, including the tendency of peer regulation to become excessively bureaucratic and labour intensive. They cast some doubt on the potential of the initiatives to assist NGOs to be more accountable to affected communities.
Home Cultures
Volume 11, Number 2, July 2014, pp. 237-261(25)
Queer Domicide: LGBT Displacement and Home Loss in Natural Disaster Impact, Response, and Recovery
Gorman-Murray, Andrew; McKinnon, Scott; Dominey-Howes, Dale
Abstract:
This article examines lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT) experiences of displacement, home loss, and rebuilding in the face of natural disasters. LGBT vulnerability and resilience are little studied in disaster research; this article begins to fill this gap, focusing on LGBT domicide—how LGBT homes are “un made” in disasters. To do this, we critically read a range of non-government, scholarly, and media commentaries on LGBT experiences of natural disasters in various settings over 2004–12, including South Asia, the USA, Haiti, and Japan. Additionally, we utilize preliminary data from pilot work on LGBT experiences of 2011 disasters in Brisbane, Australia, and Christchurch, New Zealand. we find that disaster impacts are the first stage of ongoing problems for sexual and gender minorities. Disaster impacts destroy LGBT residences and neighborhoods, but response and recovery strategies favor assistance for heterosexual nuclear families and elide the concerns and needs of LGBT survivors. Disaster impact, response, and recovery “un makes” LGBT home and belonging, or inhibits homemaking, at multiple scales, from the residence to the neighborhood. we focus on three scales or sites: first, destruction of individual residences, and problems with displacement and rebuilding; second, concerns about privacy and discrimination for individuals and families in temporary shelters; and third, loss and rebuilding of LGBT neighborhoods and community infrastructure (e.g. leisure venues and organizational facilities).
Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration
Vol. 4, No. 1
[PDF] Religious Plurality and the Politics of Representation in Refugee Camps: Accounting for the Lived Experiences of Syrian Refugees Living in Zaatari
p.37
Kat Eghdamian
Abstract
A review of existing literature in forced migration studies and of UNHCR policies on refugee camps reveals a paucity of engagement with issues of religious identity, religious plurality, and religious experience in refugee camp settings. This article asks why this is so and posits that an engagement with these issues is urgently needed. Drawing on the current humanitarian crisis in Syria, it argues for the importance of accounting for the lived experiences of Syrian refugees living in the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan. An exploration of such lived experiences can re-veal necessary knowledge about the role of religion in forced migration studies for both academics and practitioners in the field, as well as give rise to more meaningful engagement with and effective protection and assistance policies for forced migrants.